Sidebar

24
Fri, Nov
0 New Articles

How can it be, Gregorian Bivolaru doesn’t have the right to defence?!

Article

Gregorian Bivolaru’s arrest in France has brought to our topsy-turvy media the question, used over and over again until it’s lost all meaning:
Who profits?

By Ion Cristoiu

Editor note:

Ion Cristoiu is a Romanian journalist, publisher, and political analyst. His name is one of the most respected in the Romanian mass media landscape, being often at the origin of huge movements of constructive criticism of the corrupted power (of which, unfortunately, Romania was not short of after 1989), irrespective to the political color.

He was editor-in-chief of the daily Evenimentul Zilei during its heyday in the 1990s, when the average daily circulation topped 600,000, making it the most read newspaper in Romania, and one of the most read in Eastern Europe. He also founded or played a major role at a number of the weekly publications of that era: Expres, Expres Magazin, and Zig-Zag. All of these publications were highly critical of former president, Ion Iliescu.
Ion Cristoiu was also the anchor for TV talkshow “Ultimul cuvant” (The Final Statement). With collaborations in many other important media outlets, and being a guest on important talkshows, he is now a prominent figure in public opinion in Romania.

Presently he is a reputed blogger with a large audience. The following article was published on his blog on 29th of February 2016: http://www.cristoiublog.ro/gindul-de-luni-29-februarie-2016/


How can it be, Gregorian Bivolaru doesn’t have the right to defence?!

Gregorian Bivolaru’s arrest in France has brought to our topsy-turvy media the question, used over and over again until it’s lost all meaning:
Who profits?

To the question who does Gregorian Bivolaru’s arrest profit, many answers have been given.
All of them implying that many politicians secretly attended MISA’s classes and Gregorian Bivolaru will expose them once he’s brought home.

Under the mark of Who profits? but modified as Who trembles? the television channel Romania TV remembered (which is something commendable) an interview made by the undersigned with Adrian Nastase after he lost the 2004 elections and before he was imprisoned.
In this interview I claimed, even asking Adrian Nastase about this, that the former Prime Minister lost the elections also because of MISA.
Starting from this, people from Romania TV quickly drew the conclusion that Gregorian Bivolaru’s arrest makes Traian Basescu tremble, given the fact that MISA helped Traian Basescu win the elections.

As I had taken the interview, I was summoned by telephone to give my opinion regarding whether Traian Basescu was helped by MISA to win the elections or not.
People from Romania TV were set on the idea that Traian Basescu was helped by MISA, for this they also used my interview of Adrian Nastase as an argument.

I ineffectively tried to tell them that I didn’t say that in the interview even for an instant. MISA’s role in Traian Basescu’s election victory is not due to a trade made by Traian Basescu with MISA, but due to the resounding imbecility of our authorities at the time of Adrian Nastase’s government. So, at the end of day, Adrian Nastase massively contributed – by the way in which the anti-Bivolaru operation took place – to losing the elections because of himself.

Due to the fact that not much was understood from my intervention on Romania TV, I feel the need to explain here the role played by the MISA case in Adrian Nastase’s election loss.
On March 18, 2004, 300 police and paramilitary forces, under the direction of prosecutors, raided Gregorian Bivolaru’s apartment and buildings of MISA members during an oversized power operation with the abusive behaviour typical of a “banana republic”.

Gregorian Bivolaru was sentenced on June 14, 2013 by the HCCJ to 6 years in prison for sex with a minor in repeated form.
This accusation came after two other courts, the Sibiu Court and the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal had acquitted him.
And do you know why?
Because the prosecutors could not bring any evidence.
Furthermore, they refused in both courts to file the warrants for authorization of wiretaps on the grounds that it was a state secret.

Let us admit that Gregorian Bivolaru was living with a minor, even though the girl claimed throughout the trials, including the one at the HCCJ, that nothing like that ever happened, and more than this, that she was physically molested by prosecutors into declaring that she had sexual relations with Gregorian Bivolaru.
Did this offence justify the police raid on March 18, 2004?
As it was deployed and displayed on TV channels, this raid seemed to be made against some drug cartel in Colombia, by SEAL troops prepared to meet armed resistance.

Undoubtedly, the operation of the Romanian authorities was an unspeakable abuse.
The way it took place, the press releases of the General Prosecution, and the press campaign fueled by the Romanian Intelligence Service at the time, gave to a simple police action (the arrest and search of a person) the rank of an abusive action against MISA.
Moreover, this impression was amplified by the flow of harsh official charges directed at Gregorian Bivolaru (sexual perversion with a minor, trafficking of minors, sexual corruption, sex with a minor).

Of all these accusations, only one remains.
In these circumstances, it is quite natural that in Stockholm, Sweden, the Supreme Court, seeing how the Romanian authorities behaved, granted political asylum to Gregorian Bivolaru in December 2005.
The Supreme Court held that Mr. Gregorian Bivolaru was a victim of unspeakable abuse by the Romanian authorities.

The “Banana Republic” operation on March 18, 2004, visibly directed against MISA, aroused the hatred of the members of the organization towards then Prime Minister, Adrian Nastase.
The year 2004 was marked by strong protests from members of the organization against the government, against Adrian Nastase.
In the 2004 campaign, the Misa members conducted a fanatical campaign against the candidate Adrian Nastase.
In this sense, I claimed and I claim that Adrian Nastase lost also because of MISA.

Did Adrian Nastase know of this “banana republic” operation, conducted as if on purpose for him to lose the elections?
I do not know.
What I know is that on March 18, 2004, the institutional forces of post-Revolution Romania showed us, for the first time ever, that they can exceed in primitivism and imbecility the institutional forces that existed under Stalin. In 2004, our supposedly independent press repeated, without any verification, all the accusations of the authorities against Gregorian Bivolaru, against Misa, without also asking the defendant.

I realize that now it is the same.
Gregorian Bivolaru is the target of violent, tendentious press campaigns, only based on the point of view of the authorities.
The victim is not questioned about the charges brought, such as professional standards require.
As in the case of victims of SRI – DNA pair [Romanian Intelligence Service – National Anti-corruption Directorate], Gregorian Bivolaru is deprived today, in our press, of a human right in a democracy:
The right to defense!